<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ViEmu Forums - But in "." command]]></title>
		<link>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=100</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in But in "." command.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: But in "." command]]></title>
			<link>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=420#p420</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve fixed this in 2.0.39:</p><p>&nbsp; http://forums.ngedit.com/viewtopic.php?id=110</p><p>Regards,</p><p>&nbsp; Jon</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Jon_Symnum)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=420#p420</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: But in "." command]]></title>
			<link>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=394#p394</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Cool, thanks a lot for the detailed steps to repro it. I will have a look at it next week and get back to you, hopefully it will be an easy fix.</p><p>Thanks and best regards,</p><p>&nbsp; Jon</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Jon_Symnum)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=394#p394</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: But in "." command]]></title>
			<link>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=392#p392</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I discovered the problem, or at least what triggers the problem. If you open a new code window, the &quot;.&quot; command works just fine. However, if you split the code window (i.e., using the <strong>Window --&gt; Split</strong> Visual Studio menu command), the &quot;.&quot; feature stops working until you close the window and reopen it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (timaki)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=392#p392</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: But in "." command]]></title>
			<link>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=390#p390</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm... the persistence is weird. I&#039;ll send you an instrumented build in a few days to generate logs that may help in pinpointing the problem.</p><p>Thanks,</p><p>&nbsp; Jon</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Jon_Symnum)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=390#p390</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: But in "." command]]></title>
			<link>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=389#p389</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Additional information that may help.</p><p>The problem seems to be on a per-source-file basis. If I have multiple source files open at once, the &quot;.&quot; problem can appear in one file, but have no problem in another file.</p><p>If I close a file (both source and designer) in Visual Studio, and then reopen that source file, the problem goes away for that file. That&#039;s my workaround.</p><p>If I keep a source file open that was having the problem and then close Visual Studio completely, the next time I open that project in Visual Studio, naturally the source file will still be open. In this case, the problem <strong>does not</strong> go away.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (timaki)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=389#p389</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: But in "." command]]></title>
			<link>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=388#p388</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sure, this is due to the buffer-sensing tech not working correctly. I will look into it in detail next week, I apologize for not being able to investigate it before.</p><p>Best regards,</p><p>&nbsp; Jon</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Jon_Symnum)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=388#p388</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: But in "." command]]></title>
			<link>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=382#p382</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>OOPS: That should be &quot;Bug in &#039;.&#039; command&quot;, not &quot;But....&quot; Sorry about that.</strong></p><p>There is an intermitent problem with the &quot;.&quot; (repeat) command in ViEmu/VS. I am converting a large Visual Basic project from Oracle the SQL Server, and I have to update many of the embedded SQL statements. One such SQL feature that must be converted is to rename the NVL() function to ISNULL(). It&#039;s an easy change, and one that is perfect for the &quot;.&quot; command. When my cursor is at the start of NVL(), I just type:</p><p><strong>cwISNULL&lt;ESC&gt;</strong></p><p>(Of course, &quot;&lt;ESC&gt;&quot; means the escape key.) Then I move to the next NVL() in the code and press &quot;.&quot;, and it converts to ISNULL() expected. Great.</p><p>However, there are times when I convert the first NVL() and then use the &quot;.&quot; on the next one, and nothing changes. The only thing that happens is that the cursor moves to the left one position. At those times I have to issue the &quot;cw&quot; command for every change I want to make. I also noticed that other repetitive changes that I had used &quot;.&quot; for in the past no longer work.</p><p>At some later time, everything will start working again. I have not determined a cause. I have no special add-ins in Visual Studio. I am using VS2005 on Windows XP Pro with all applied updates. I am working within a standard VB code window. I can&#039;t think of anything I am doing that is non-standard, as I am spending my entire day just modifying existing code. I&#039;m not even building or running the code at this point.</p><p>There must be some flag within ViEmu that is causing &quot;.&quot; to interpret things differently, or that is causing your special buffer-analysis code to read the changes differently. Thanks for checking this.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (timaki)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=382#p382</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
