<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ViEmu Forums - Missing features]]></title>
		<link>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=3103</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Missing features.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:15:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Missing features]]></title>
			<link>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=5972#p5972</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Are there plans to implement the delete ring buffer?<br />if i cut something with v$y then go somewhere else and C^r0 it should drop my yank there.&nbsp; Instead, it seems that my yank isn&#039;t promoted into the ring buffer. In fact, it doesn&#039;t seem like there is a buffer at all.<br />If i use dd 5 times, &quot;&quot;, &quot;0,&quot;1,&quot;2, and &quot;3, should have stuff in them.</p><p>Have you reconsidered implementing vimscript? I&#039;d be really nice to be able to use some of the more powerful formatting scripts from vim.</p><p>Is there any way to change where/how VS setups the folds in code so that they are more like the vim fold=syntax ?<br />Even without that, the fold commands seem wonky. zO zo zC and zc all seem to be set as &quot;toggle&quot;?&nbsp; They also seem to fold the outermost block instead of the innermost.</p><p>Using VS2005.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (kulseran)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.viemu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=5972#p5972</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
